The Least of Us

One of the best-kept
secrets of New Testament exegesis concerns the interpretation of the parable of
the Sheep and the Goats, found in Mt 25:31-46. Here Jesus says “the
nations”—everybody—will be gathered before him and he will separate them based
on their treatment of “the least of these brothers” of his (v. 40). Jesus’
dramatic and poignant identification with “the least” has stirred countless
hearts for social justice. As the New
Jerome Commentary puts it, “This much-loved text presents a practical
religion of deeds of loving-kindness.”
So
far so good?
The problem is, commentators throughout history have
recognized that the “least of these brothers” refers not to the needy in
general, but to the needy of the disciples in particular [1]. The evidence for
this is very strong: When Jesus speaks of his family, as he does here, he’s always referring to his disciples, those
who do God’s will (Mt 12:46-50; 23:8-9; 28:10). Commentators also point out
that “the least of these” in Mt 25:40, 45 is similar to “little ones” in Mt
10:42; 18:6; 10, 14, where he’s also referring to his disciples. Finally, there
is a parallel in Mt 10:40-42:
He who receives you receives me, and he who receives me receives the
one who sent me. Anyone who receives a prophet because he is a prophet will
receive a prophet's reward, and anyone who receives a righteous man because he
is a righteous man will receive a righteous man's reward. And if anyone gives
even a cup of cold water to one of these little ones because he is my disciple,
I tell you the truth, he will certainly not lose his reward.
This interpretation
is the one chosen historically by no less than John Calvin and John Chrysostom,
and more recently by evangelical academic authorities Don Carson, Michael
Green, Craig Keener and others [2]. In fact, the only sources I ran across who support
the more familiar interpretation, that Jesus is referring to the needy in
general, were Jerome and Ron Sider, in his Rich
Christians in an Age of Hunger. The more familiar interpretation is the one
you have probably always heard in sermons; the other is the one you’ll find in
a thoughtful commentary.
If you think about
this even a little, you’ll find it unsettling. We are trained as Christians not
to show partiality, and to see all men and women as our brothers and sisters.
How strange that Jesus would judge not on the basis of our treatment of all of
these, but on our treatment of the least of the disciples. Does Jesus not care
about the needy if they are, say, Muslims or atheists?
To come to terms
with this, we need to put ourselves in the shoes of his disciples. This comes
at the end of Jesus’ “Olivet discourse,” delivered to his disciples from the
Mount of Olives, overlooking
When Jesus says that
his disciples—those who remain true to him and pour out their lives in his
service—are a litmus test for judgment, he is saying that they don’t just carry his Gospel. In first-century
Jesus knows the
travails which await his brothers and sisters, and identifies with them in the
deepest way possible. Imagine sending your own sister into a world which will
hate and reject her. What gratitude you would feel for those who offer protection
and support! In the same way, Jesus’ heart is with all of those in the Church
who are needy, and his gratitude is for all who care for them in their time of
need. Of course we are to show God’s love to all men, whether they have
accepted the Gospel or not—this is deeply embedded in our Gospel. But as Calvin
says of this passage, “though there is a common tie that binds all the children
of Adam, there is a still more sacred union among the children of God.”
Jesus cares very
much how you are received when you step out in faith and make yourself vulnerable
for the sake of the kingdom. He will not forget how you are treated, especially
when you are one of the least of his brothers or sisters. Similarly, let Jesus’
compassion and concern move you to special concern for those who are giving their
lives for him, yet are needy—even thirsty, naked, hungry or in prison. (For me,
this passage brings to mind Rawn and Bernard Uguoke, friends and missionaries who spoke at RCRC two
years ago and who are still searching for the support they need to minister in
[1] Commentators vary on whether this phrase
refers to the needy among the Church, the emissaries of the Church, or the
Church in general, but generally agree it refers to the Church,
and not to the needy of the world in general.
[2] Craig S. Keener, A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew
(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999); Don Carson, Expositor’s
Bible Commentary, Vol. 8 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984); Michael Green, The Message of Matthew (Downer’s Grove:
IVP, 2000). See also Richard Gardner, Matthew
(Waterloo, Ontario: Herald, 1991); D. A. Carson, For the Love of God (Wheaton: Crossway, 1998).